RE: Samba, LFS, Linux->W2K-NTFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks for that!
Yep - works fine.
Since I really don't need to copy >2G files that often,
that solves the problem for me.

Now to work out why there is a 1 year old patch for the
kernel that noone at RedHat has applied ...
Maybe noone at kernel.org liked it either?
Silly me assumed it should be there already - I guess I
should have checked the source.

Who needs more than 640K anyway .... :-)

Ow Mun Heng said:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andrew Smith
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 6:04 AM
>> To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Samba, LFS, Linux->W2K-NTFS
>>
>>
>> Trying to copy a >2G file using samba to a W2K,NTFS
>> partition fails at 2G (From RH9 latest kernel from RH
>> and latest samba from www.samba.org)
>
> I read about this problem in the samba list..
>
> The only thing which was said was..
>
>>My fstab line is this:
>>//Tigger/S  /TiggerS  smbfs  lfs,ip=192.168.7.7,noauto,username=andy  0
>
> LFS does not help..
>
> According to the samba list, smbfs _is_ limited to 2GB.. something about
> kernel limits.. smbfs is actually not in samba's implementation..
>
> They suggested using smbclient instead.. and using "put" at the smb:> cli


-- 
Shrike-list mailing list
Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux