>>If you are on a Windows Box then why don't you lock down your Windows
>>box? Isn't there something more important than a putty session that
>>needs protection while you're in the loo?
hehe.. actually, there's nothing much on the Windows box. I'm more concerned
with the linux box since it's under my care and the windows box is under the
local IS. :)
Besides, one's a server and the other is only a windows End user box.
Cheers, .^.
Mun Heng, Ow /V\
H/M Engineering /( )\
Western Digital M'sia ^^-^^
DID : 03-7870 5168 The Linux Advocate
-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Greshko [mailto:Ed.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 12:00 PM
To: Shrike List
Subject: RE: Locking of a Xterm Terminal
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 11:44, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> >>Screensaver?
>
> Nope that wouldn't do. as Mentioned, I'm using Putty (ssh terminal client)
> to access the server from a Windows Box.
If you are on a Windows Box then why don't you lock down your Windows
box? Isn't there something more important than a putty session that
needs protection while you're in the loo?
--
"An opinion is like an asshole - everybody has one."
- Clint Eastwood as Harry Callahan, The Dead Pool - 1988.
--
Shrike-list mailing list
Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
--
Shrike-list mailing list
Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
