File Server irritants (newbie)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I am happy to say I have finally succeeded in installing and configuring
a file server that allows for group control.

Here are the particulars:
Workstations are all Windows computers (Currently they are Win2kpro but
I need to keep the option open for connecting 95/98 computers.  I have
not had need to connect MACs and don't know how to support them.)
Each user is a member of one or more groups.
Each member has a home/membername directory. Its only use is for the
user's My Documents folder to be mapped there.
Each group has a home/groupname directory mapped to a common drive name
for each group member (i.e. accounting is always mapped to drive G: and
management is always mapped to drive H:)



Here are a few things that I would like to change

1)	Prevent users from logging in at the keyboard of the server.
The users buck, root and net manager will need permission to log from
the keyboard but I don't want ANYONE in the company to have access to
the server directly from the keyboard.

2)	Each user's private directory has Linux OS (I guess) related
files.  Since they won't be using Linux, I would like to either delete
them or create empty directories like the groups create.

3)	Somewhere in the mix I setup a public directory.  Users have
browse access and nothing else.  I think I know how to remove it though.


4)	I have a folder and account setup called pcguest.  "bad-user"
defaults to that folder but has not access in it.  I am wondering if I
can remove that account and folder as I see no need to have guest
accounts at this time.  Guest accounts need to be on the workstations
and guests have no reason to access my server, at least not in the
business model I am using.

5)	What am I not thinking of?


I have learned that initially setting up Linux as a firewall is a PITA,
lots of work, I can save the necessary config files to make next time
quick and easy.

It looks like I have to modify the samba.conf for each group I add, but
adding users is very easy. 

I downloaded samba-2.2.8a-2rh9.i386.rpm from Samba.org.  I read that 3.x
does not include SWAT (which I like).  Earlier on a previous install I
tried updating to 3.x but the system still shows 2.x being used.  I
don't know if it is important that I upgrade or not.  I don't care as
long as the version I am using will work safely and reliably.  It might
be that SWAT isn't compatible, I don't know.  I didn't try to install
3.x on this system.  I'll leave it up to those of you with more
experience to let me know if it is something I need or not. 

When I installed RHL 9, it installed Samba and when I installed the
Samba 2.x that I downloaded, it appeared to have uninstalled the
previous version. 

Once the dust settles on the four items listed above, I will want to add
backup and security.  Once those are completed, I will have my dedicated
file server and will select feature to learn.

Thank you all for your help.

Buck



-- 
Shrike-list mailing list
Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux