Re: RH9 on a dual-processor?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 8/1/2003 at 3:54 PM Globe Trotter wrote:

>thanks, all! someone on this list earlier suggested a kernel 2.4.20-xx
>where xx
>is a high number for optimal perfomance. the dual processor did come with
>2.4.20-8 pre-installed. does it make any sense to move to a higher kernel?
>
>tia!
>
>__________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
>http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
>
>
>-- 
>Shrike-list mailing list
>Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list

personally, i usually run whatever the latest stable version of the kernel is
on my linux machines. i don't know that it makes much difference, though.


regards,

shane


-- 
Shrike-list mailing list
Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux