looking to clarify necessity of rawhide RPMs for 2.6 kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



  in an attempt to start summarizing red hat-related issues surrounding
the 2.6 kernel, i'm interested in clarification on the need for (and
function of) the few rawhide RPMS that seem to be necessary, particularly
those RPMs that are *absolutely* necessary and those that are required
only for additional apps.

  using the versions that i got either from rawhide or from arjan's
directory:
 

modutils-2.4.21-18:  pretty clearly necessary to handle both the
  2.6 way of dealing with modules, and backward compatible for
  the 2.4 kernel.  seems pretty obvious you need to upgrade this.


mkinitrd-3.5.7-2:  i upgraded this based on someone else's recommendation,
  and it seems to work, but can someone explain what it adds/fixes
  WRT to 2.6?  just curious.


initscripts-7.28-1:  again, updated based on someone else's advice.
  i still get a number of boot-time errors/warnings, but once the
  system is up, everything seems to be fine.  so what's the change
  here?


nfs-utils-1.0.3-4.1:  clearly optional, depending on whether you're 
  running NFS.  what's the fixes/enhancements here?


oprofile-0.5.4-3:  apparently, a 2.6-compatible profiler, which is
  only necessary if you plan on profiling


  so, starting with a pristine 2.6-test kernel, is the above all
that one needs to upgrade for the time being?  and are there any
interesting patches in the current 2.6-test RPMs that would be worth
pointing out?

  thanks.

rday


-- 
Shrike-list mailing list
Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux