Re: Redhat 9 kernel changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 19 May 2003, Bob Arendt wrote:

> In the latest *RedHat* kernel, I've noticed that there's a "workaround"
> implemented in:
> /usr/src/linux-2.4.20-13.9/kernel/exit.c, routine sys_wait4():
> 
> 	if (current->sighand->action[SIGCHLD-1].sa.sa_handler == SIG_IGN) {
> 		static unsigned long last_timestamp;
> 
> 		// rate-limit it to 1 per minute:
> 		if (jiffies - last_timestamp > 60*HZ) {
> 			last_timestamp = jiffies;
> 			printk(KERN_INFO "application bug: %s(%d) has SIGCHLD set to SIG_IGN but calls wait().\n", current->comm, current->pid);
> 			printk(KERN_INFO "(see the NOTES section of 'man 2 wait'). Workaround activated.\n");
> 		}
> 		current->sighand->action[SIGCHLD-1].sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;
> 		workaround = 1;
> 	}
> 	add_wait_queue(&current->wait_chldexit,&wait);
> 
> If the parent SIGCHLD is set to SIG_IGN, I get this printed in the
> system log.  Nifty.  I understand why this is a problem, and I see this in
> the RedHat 9 release notes.
> 
> But I don't see this change in Linus's 2.4 or 2.5 bitkeeper trees or
> in the latest kernel.org patch sets (thought it might be in one of
> the "ac" patch sets).  Is this becoming part of the official kernel?
> 
> Is there some way I can browse RedHat kernel changes to see the history
> of code changes?  Something like the BitKeeper or SourceForge browsers would
> be helpfull.  The RPM changelog for the kernel-source package didn't
> give any hint of this change either.

It'd really be nice if the rpm changelog were kept more in sync with real 
changes...

	- Panu -




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux