Re: kernel 2.4.20-13.9 and apt problems?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 16 May 2003 10:10:05 -0400, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:

> I think apt on redhat always does a rpm --force --no-deps which just
> seems like bad new to me.

Hmm, I would understand if you relied on the information that can be
found on the Yum home page. However, I do not understand what makes you
think apt4rpm "always does a rpm --force --no-deps". It doesn't use --force.
A fragment in the source code is still there, but is obsolete. There is
code that can enable --nodeps for Install/Erase, but during normal
operation it doesn't use it either. Nevertheless, it's there and apt4rpm
might use it whenever it likes to. I don't like that. My other reasons
to use Yum together with http://www.fedora.us are number of reported
problems/issues with apt4rpm and also that during my tests it added
option --oldpackage by default and that I find it much more convenient
to create and maintain local Yum repositories than apt repositories.

- -- 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+xRqR0iMVcrivHFQRArhRAJwNAvjz2tfJJN55Z+riBPoI4Lk12gCfY/Ze
BZb3hs2g8E7F4+bNvjl0pBI=
=gHNO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux