Re: why does one need an initrd if using LVM?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: why does one need an initrd if using LVM?
From: Gordon Messmer <yinyang@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 03 May 2003 21:02:14 -0700
Delivered-to: shrike-list@listman.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0305032210230.9738-100000@dell>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0305032210230.9738-100000@dell>
Reply-to: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: shrike-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030225

Robert P. J. Day wrote:

from the excerpt werner provided above, it seems clear that that particular linuxrc corresponds to what the RH install would generate by default: ext3 and LVM supported as modules.

Yes, the modules, but also the vgscan and vgchange programs and the device nodes used for your volumes.

References:
- Re: why does one need an initrd if using LVM?
  - From: Robert P. J. Day

Prev by Date: Re: Mozilla/galeon crash
Next by Date: Re: Mozilla/galeon crash
Previous by thread: Re: why does one need an initrd if using LVM?
Next by thread: Re: why does one need an initrd if using LVM?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Users] [Centos Users] [Kernel Development] [Red Hat Install] [Red Hat Watch] [Red Hat Development] [Red Hat Phoebe Beta] [Yosemite Forum] [Fedora Discussion] [Gimp] [Stuff] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux