On Sun, 15 Jun 2003, M. Fioretti wrote: > On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 13:20:42 at 01:20:42PM -0500, Mike Burger (mburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > They're legitimate subscribers...why trash their messages, simply > > because they haven't properly trained themselves to fix the subject > > before they hit send? Rather...they should be trained, not ignored. > > > > Which almost is exactly what Joshua said: if dumb subjects like > "X-list digest", but also "no subject" or "question" or > "help".... were trashed by the mailing list software, and *that* > software trained the author sending to him a message saying "message > rejected because of meaningless subject"... the list would be better. Sure...and the complaints that the Red Hat lists, and/or the Linux community, are all crotchety, or unfriendly, or unhelpful, etc, ad infinitum, would persist. -- Mike Burger http://www.bubbanfriends.org Visit the Dog Pound II BBS telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000 To be notified of updates to the web site, send a message to: site-update-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with a message of: subscribe