Re: Will RH8 and RH9 Co-Exist? MORE INFO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Additional info from Hardware Browser:

Drive: /dev/hda  79656/16/63  Maxtor  6E040l0
       /dev/hdb   2498/255/63 Quantum FireballP LM 20.5

DEVICE  START END  SIZE(MB) TYPE
/dev/hda
hda1  1      203    100    ext3
hda2  204    78616  38594  ext3
hda3  78617  79656  512    ext3

__
\//dev/hdb 
__
\/ hdb4 2434  2498  510  Extended
   hdb5 2434  2498  510  linux-swap
hdb1     1    1253  9829 fat32
hdb2   1254   1266  102  ext3
hdb3   1254   2433  9154 ext3

Hope that helps.

Thanks!  doc

On Sun, 2003-06-08 at 20:30, Colburn wrote:
> I have just successfully loaded RH9 on one HDD and RH8 has been running
> on the other.
> 
> The RH9 is on the boot disk, RH8 is loaded on the Slave.
> 
> When I start up I see:
> 
> Mounting local file systems Mount: LABEL = /boot duplicate - not mounted
> FAILED
> 
> Later ... 
> 
> Mounting other local file systems Mount: LABEL = /boot duplicate - not
> mounted FAILED
> 
> RH8 has a few early updates but not many, RH9 is right off the boxed CD
> set.
> 
> I'd like to be able to pull some stuff off the RH8 HDD over to the RH9
> HDD and then wipe it clean.  At this point I cannot even see it.
> 
> Thanks!  doc
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux