I should have mentioned that the vuln says its for 9.12 but all 9.12 did was fix the problem in 9.11 so I assumed we're still vuln since thats redhat did also. sorry if i'm wrong but it seems like something that would be easy enough to overlook due to version numbering. On Wed, 02 Jul 2003 05:21:47 -0700 vincent <pros-n-cons@xxxxxxxxxx> said: > last month on June 11th there were a ton of security problems in ethereal > why has redhat not updated? last update I can find is April 23rd. for > something else: > http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/updates/9/en/os/SRPMS/ > > The announcement can be found here. > http://www.ethereal.com/appnotes/enpa-sa-00010.html > > If we're vuln this should have been updated promptly. > > > -- > Shrike-list mailing list > Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
