Now that I've had some sleep, here is what I've found this morning... This is the exact process that seems to have broken it: ln -sf /lib/libc-2.3.1.so /lib/tls/libc.so.6 ln -sf /lib/libpthread-0.10.so /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 I then did: ln -sf /lib/tls/libc-2.3.2.so /lib/tls/libc.so.6 ln -sf /lib/libpthread-0.29.so /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 That last one seems to be the problem. I don't see a /lib/libpthread-0.29.so. Can anyone tell me where these are actually supposed to link back to? All related I'm sure, but now I get the same errors as in the post below at start-up on sendmail. TIA, Brian On Sat, 19 Apr 2003, Brian Schmidt wrote: > I think I know the process of how I got knocked out (and now can't get > back in), but I'm not sure where it needs to be restored to. You would > think I would learn not to get too experimental at 1:15am anymore. I was > updating my UT2K3 installation, which I had used some workarounds someone > used to get it working with RHL 9. I can't remember the exact changes I > made, but they were changing around some of the symlinks in /lib/i686. I > thought I had made the switches back, but something must not have been > right because now I get this message when I try to startx: > /usr/bin/gnome-session: relocation error: /lib/i686/libpthread.so.0: > symbol _h_errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link > time reference > > waiting for X server to shut down > > Here is what my current /lib/i686/* looks like: > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1548424 Apr 7 18:25 libc-2.3.2.so > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Apr 12 09:33 libc.so.6 -> > libc-2.3.2.so > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 212020 Apr 7 18:25 libm-2.3.2.so > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Apr 12 09:33 libm.so.6 -> > libm-2.3.2.so > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 93268 Apr 7 18:25 libpthread-0.10.so > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Apr 12 09:33 libpthread.so.0 -> > libpthread-0.10.so > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 37592 Apr 7 18:25 librt-2.3.2.so > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Apr 12 09:33 librt.so.1 -> > librt-2.3.2.so > > Does it look obvious to anyone what I managed to mangle and what to switch > it back to? I don't have another RHL 9 box to compare it to. > > TIA, > Brian > > bts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org > > > > -- > Shrike-list mailing list > Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list > bts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
