Does Shrike-List dislike me -- ATHLON & Shrike - *imperfect*alliance=random lockups?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----Forwarded Message----- (Hmm, why didn't this message end up on the
mailing list nor on the Shrike-List archives page?  Oh well, here it is
again.)

> From: Benjamin Vander Jagt <benjaminvanderjagt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: ATHLON & Shrike - *imperfect* alliance=random lockups?
> Date: 17 Apr 2003 17:04:42 -0400
> 
> > Elton,
> > 
> > I have an athlon thunderbird 1.0 also on a Abit KT7A-RAID that is
> having
> > random lockups.  I have not been able to track it down whatsoever. 
> > Pretty stable under psyche and phoebe and many more lockups now with
> > exactly the same hardware.  It will lock to the point where I cannot
> ssh
> > to the machine.  I have had an unresolved problem since 7.2 with the
> > southbridge issues but this is really pushing me towards a new
> > motherboard and chip.
> 
> It's funny you should mention that chip and board.  Most of my Shrike
> problems (including exactly this same set of problems) are on an Athlon
> T-Bird 1.0 on a Jetway 867 board.  The chip was previously on an Abit
> KT7A-RAID.  (Personally, I can't stand the Abit boards.  I loved them at
> first.)  One funny thing that the Abit KT7A boards (RAID and non-RAID)
> do is use the wrong voltage when starting with a new chip for the first
> time, even when the CMOS has been cleared.  I've run through many chips
> on several of these boards and have lots of experience with them.  I've
> lost several chips on them, too.  They do something to the chips that
> causes them to only work on that board.  (Of course, I don't think it's
> intentional.)  Sometimes it just kills them.  Trying to run a 1.4, even
> with the BIOS updated, will generally fry it.  I considered myself
> lucky, since I put the 1.0 back on a Jetway, and it never gave any
> problems in Psyche or Windows.  Is it possible that Shrike is using a
> part of the CPU or demanding performance out of the CPU in such a way
> that normally undetectable damage shows up?  Or more likely, does
> something in Shrike not know how to use the 1.0 T-bird chip anymore?
> 
> Mine's a 100MHz FSB.  (Not my choice.)  What FSB are you guys running
> at?






[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux