Re: More bugs in 9 than 8.1-3? Samba DoS, Mozilla, Prelink problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 11 Apr 2003 07:27:39 -0400 (EDT), Mike A. Harris wrote:

> >> [...] Red Hat has never had an 8.1 distribution.
> >> 
> >> 7 -> 7.1 -> 7.2 -> 7.3 -> 8.0 -> 9
> >> 
> >> No 8.1.
> >
> ><trollmode>
> >
> >7 = 7.0 -> 7.1 -> 7.2 -> 7.3 -> 8.0 -> 9
> >
> ></trollmode>
> 
> <pedantmode>
> No, Red Hat Linux 7, was called "Red Hat Linux 7".  There was no 
> ".0" on it either.
> </pedantmode>
> 
> Before anyone says "well the ftp site's directory says 7.0 blah 
> blah blah", yes I am aware of that already.  The release however 
> is "7" regardless of what the ftp master made the name of the 
> hard disk directory on the ftp site.  He was fired and his family 
> was tortured for 4 full OS releases.
> 
> ;oP

http://www.europe.redhat.com/documentation/rhl7/ref-guide-en/

http://www.redhat.com -- searching for "7.0":
Showing results 21-30 of approximately 5900.

Make sure the same doesn't happen with "9". ;)

- -- 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+lq520iMVcrivHFQRAk4YAJ9CXWgHQbKd7U5eSlOFT2NmDGyCXwCeJYtv
2V2PsmfDknoz9kn5HlP9PCo=
=dAk1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux