I agree. It was the first non-windows mail client I learned and it hasn't let me down in the last 11 years (has it been that long???). It has the basics and is very easy to learn for first time *nix users. The same goes for Pico. Ever try explaining vim or emacs to someone who just wants to make a slight change in a config file for the first time? Jason -----Original Message----- From: shrike-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:shrike-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Audioslave - 7M3 - Live Sent: Wednesday, 02 April, 2003 20:58 To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: What text-mode e-mail client instead on Pine? Ed.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Steve Snyder wrote: > > >>I've been using Pine for many years as a text-mode e-mail client on which >>I could check the status of my servers. Given Pine's "deprecated" status >>in RHL, I'm looking for an alternative. > > > Why look for an alternative? Why not just download/compile source > yourself? I won't give up pine just because Red Hat has to....or feels > they have to. > > Ed > Pine should stay. I use it and think that it is still worthy to include. Jim -- A good reputation is more valuable than money. -- Publilius Syrus -- Shrike-list mailing list Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
