On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On 1 Apr 2003, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > > On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 17:50, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > if, in that partition, the ISOs are in the directory > > > /a/b/c/RedHat, the directory name i'd feed as the location > > > of the ISOs would be just /a/b/c. > > > > Just place the isos in /a/b/c and say that the location of the ISOs is > > /a/b/c. No need for a RedHat subdirectory > > since i just got back to my system with the online docs, what > you're saying is that that's changed since RH 8.0. in the > official 8.0 install guide, i read "... if the ISO images are in > /test/new/RedHat, you would enter /test/new". It looks like the 8.0 documentation is wrong, and was wrong for 8.0 - you used to need a RedHat directory for unpacked source but I have been doing hard disk updates at least as far back as 8.0 without the RedHat directory. I wonder if it is still wrong in the 9 documentation! Michael Young
