Re: Getting Latest Mozilla RPMs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Matthew,

1) move glibc-2.3.2-4.80.i386.rpm to another folder

2) tested many combination on following packages
glibc-devel-2.3.2-4.80.i386.rpm
glibc-common-2.3.2-4.80.i386.rpm
glibc-2.3.2-48.i386.rpm
glibc-2.3.2-48.i686.rpm
glibc-devel-2.3.2-48.i386.rpm
glibc-common-2.3.2-48.i386.rpm

Only found following combination went through the test installation

glibc-2.3.2-48.i686.rpm         
glibc-devel-2.3.2-4.80.i386.rpm
glibc-common-2.3.2-48.i386.rpm

# rpm -Fvh --test glibc*.rpm
Preparing...                ###########################################
[100%]

Can "glibc-devel-2.3.2-4.80.i386.rpm" work together with 
"glibc-2.3.2-48.i686.rpm".  Different version?

B.Regards
Stephen


On Sat, 2003-06-14 at 01:35, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Stephen Liu wrote:
> 
> > Hi Matthew,
> >
> > I have Athlon.  Now I have following packages downloaded
> >
> > glibc-2.3.2-4.80.i386.rpm
> > glibc-devel-2.3.2-4.80.i386.rpm
> > glibc-common-2.3.2-4.80.i386.rpm
> >
> > glibc-2.3.2-48.i386.rpm
> > glibc-2.3.2-48.i686.rpm
> > glibc-devel-2.3.2-48.i386.rpm
> > glibc-common-2.3.2-48.i386.rpm
> >
> > Except "glibc-2.3.2-48.i686.rpm" I could not i686 for other packages.  I
> > shall use "2.3.2-48.i386" packages.  Are they suitable?
> 
> The i386 packages are fine for all those packages except glibc-2.3.2-4.80,
> which must be i686.  Delete the glibc-2.3.2-4.80.i386.rpm (or move it to
> another directory), then
> 
> 	# rpm -Fvh glibc*.rpm
> 
> to upgrade all installed glibc packages at once.
> 
> -- 
> 		Matthew Saltzman


-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
Psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Red Hat General Discussion]     [Centos]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux