Re: Psyche-list digest, Vol 1 #1255 - 15 msgs (On Vacation)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I will be on vacation from Thursday 4/24 returning on Thursday 5/1  In
the event of an emergancy, please contact the tech support help line. If
your question concerns Tivoli please contact Anca Suciu (5-5156). 

>>> "psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx" 04/23/03 12:01 >>>

Send Psyche-list mailing list submissions to
	psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	psyche-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx

You can reach the person managing the list at
	psyche-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Psyche-list digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: how to find system serial number (Arjan van de Ven)
   2. Re: how to find system serial number (from sinha)
   3. Re: how to find system serial number (Edward C. Bailey)
   4. Re: SV: Complaint about change in spam controls of mailing lists
       @  Red Hat (Cliff Kent)
   5. Re: how to find system serial number (Tom Diehl)
   6. Dell Latitude D800 freezes at RH8 boot (dballester@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
   7. Re: SV: Complaint about change in spam controls of mailing lists @
       Red Hat (Steven W. Orr)
   8. Re: SV: Complaint about change in spam controls of mailing
       lists @ Red Hat (Rodolfo J. Paiz)
   9. Re: SV: Complaint about change in spam controls of mailing
       lists @ Red Hat (Rodolfo J. Paiz)
  10. Re: how to find system serial number (Michael Schwendt)
  11. Re: ipchains and masquerading help (Rodolfo J. Paiz)

--__--__--

Message: 1
Subject: Re: how to find system serial number
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
Date: 23 Apr 2003 14:27:57 +0200
Reply-To: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx


--=-3SI/rwHZ+LMNbTHuXjfU
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 2003-04-23 at 12:34, from sinha wrote:
>  Hi,
> =20
>  I am using redhat 8.0
>  I am looking for a command which can display
>  system
>  serial number. Can anyone pl.s help me.

dmidecode

--=-3SI/rwHZ+LMNbTHuXjfU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+pobNxULwo51rQBIRAlLJAKCUB7FHgQkTipg2wg8Qu3fnuOoXdgCeNlWY
DVt1ELF9j9Rbgog6kIjiQyk=
=F1z7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-3SI/rwHZ+LMNbTHuXjfU--




--__--__--

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 05:35:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: from sinha <bbsrsinha@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: how to find system serial number
To: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Reply-To: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx

I couldn't find the command "dmidecode" ..it says
"command not found"
--- Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-04-23 at 12:34, from sinha wrote:
> >  Hi,
> >  
> >  I am using redhat 8.0
> >  I am looking for a command which can display
> >  system
> >  serial number. Can anyone pl.s help me.
> 
> dmidecode
> 

> ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature
name=signature.asc



__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo
http://search.yahoo.com




--__--__--

Message: 3
To: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: how to find system serial number
From: "Edward C. Bailey" <ed@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 23 Apr 2003 08:37:42 -0400
Reply-To: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx

>>>>> "from" == from sinha <bbsrsinha@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

from> uname command gives info on version of Kernel or version of Linux
OS
from> I have. But I want to know the system serial number . Something
from> similar to true64 command "consvar" which Manipulate system
firmware
from> console environment variables

What you're looking for relies on the underlying hardware for
implementation.  On x86, there is no direct equivalent to this.  A
bout
the
closest thing to it would be the later Pentium CPU serial numbers, but
earlier Pentiums (and other processors, I would imagine) do not have
them.

Welcome to the PC world... :-)

                                Ed
-- 
Ed Bailey        Red Hat, Inc.          http://www.redhat.com/




--__--__--

Message: 4
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 08:48:05 -0400
From: Cliff Kent <cliff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SV: Complaint about change in spam controls of mailing
lists
 @  Red Hat
Reply-To: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx

 >> I've reached the point in which I will do just about anything to 
stop them without compromising the e-mails I do want to receive. <<

For the end user who is not also a mail server sys-admin...

You might take a look at the mail client in Mozilla 1.3. I've just 
switched to it.

After a little setup and a few days "training", it's moving over 90% of 
the spam to a "Junk" folder. I don't think it uses any any RBL. It 
honors my mail filters before checking for spam. And, I get to look at 
the stuff in the Junk folder before I delete it - just in case there's a

false positive.

Look for the RPM files with names ending with "_rh8_xft.i386.rpm" to 
keep your pretty fonts.

best,

Cliff Kent




--__--__--

Message: 5
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 09:46:25 -0400 (EDT)
From: Tom Diehl <tdiehl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: how to find system serial number
Reply-To: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx

On Wed, 23 Apr 2003, from sinha wrote:

> I couldn't find the command "dmidecode" ..it says
> "command not found"

Google is your friend!!

Try http://www.nongnu.org/dmidecode/

HTH,

-- 
.............Tom	"Nothing would please me more than being able to

tdiehl@xxxxxxxxxxxx	hire ten programmers and deluge the hobby market

			with good software." -- Bill Gates 1976

   			We are still waiting ....




--__--__--

Message: 6
Subject: Dell Latitude D800 freezes at RH8 boot
To: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx
From: dballester@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 15:49:02 +0200
Reply-To: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx

Hi to all:
     My company bought me a Dell Latitude D800. Of course, the first
thing
was to install RH8. All went OK but now, after Grub selection and when
kernel is booting, the computer freezes after this:

PCI_IDE: not 100% native mode; will probe irqs later
     ide0:     BM-DMA at 0xbfa0-0xbfa7, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:pio
     ide1:     BM-DMA at 0xbfa8-0xbfaf, BIOS settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:pio

Here the computer stops without messages and led keys don't change (
Num.
Bloq )

     The bizarre is that from installation CD-Rom 1 the kernel boots OK
*?
*?

Any advice?

A lot of TIAS






--__--__--

Message: 7
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 10:28:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Steven W. Orr" <steveo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Tom Diehl <tdiehl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Psyche List <psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: SV: Complaint about change in spam controls of mailing
lists @
  Red Hat
Organization: SysLang Inc.
Reply-To: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx

On Yesterday, quoth Tom Diehl:

=>On Tue, 22 Apr 2003, Steven W. Orr wrote:
=>
=>> There seems to be enough interest here that I should post the list
of 
=>> RBL's that I am currently using:
=>> 
=>
=>Does/has anyone used rfc-ignorant.org??

Most people probably don't want to use it. It has nothing to do with
spam. 
Theu target only one range: all of uunet. Their beef is that uunet's 
technical contact from the whois record is wrong. Use their RBL and you 
just shut off all domains which are clients of uunet.

-- 
-Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things
have -
-happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say
Organ
-Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are
all-
-individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
steveo at syslang.net




--__--__--

Message: 8
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 14:30:27 -0600
To: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx

From: "Rodolfo J. Paiz" <rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: SV: Complaint about change in spam controls of mailing
  lists @ Red Hat
Reply-To: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx

At 05:01 PM 4/23/2003 +0800, you wrote:
>How things are "meant" to work and how things are "used" are often
>different.  Ever take out a screw with the blade of a sissors or pound
a
>nail with the butt of a screwdriver?

Kind of my point if you read the rest of my mail...

> > My partner, for example, went after that particular problem with a
> > large-gauge shotgun, and I still don't know enough about
spamassassin to
> > remove her blocks (and I promised not to remove her system until I
had a
> > better one).
>
>Yes, the autocratic all IP addresses in China (for example) are evil.

No. Well, for some people maybe. But realize that there is another
problem: 
the sysadmin who gets TONS of grief from 209/10/11 IP addresses, and
does 
not have the knowledge or the tools yet to adequately fight that grief,
and 
who (although knowing that the solution is too sweeping) blocks those
three 
Class A blocks because AT THIS POINT IN TIME it's the best he/she can
do.

As I was saying, we must improve our ability to fight spam in other ways
so 
that fewer sysadmins take this (admittedly inferior) route.

>DUL lists are even more "stupid" since I doubt that there is an
effective
>manner to determine with any accuracy what IP address in Boreno (for
>example) are part of a DHCP group assigned to dialup lines.  Unless, of
>course, one takes the view that they've never heard of Boreno so it
must
>be a poor country and thus all they have are dialups

Ed, while I will agree with you that there is lots of discrimination on 
this Earth, that is not the only possible cause of stuff like this.
Another 
perfectly valid way to determine which IP's are dialup lines is to
contact 
a whole bunch of ISP's. Again not perfect, and subject to change, etc.
but 
not necessarily based on "Boreno is poor, fuck 'em".

I am not defending the blackhole lists here... simply stating that there

are other valid reasons (in addition to the discrimination which does 
exist, not instead of it) why such tools get created and how they get
used.


-- 
Rodolfo J. Paiz
rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx




--__--__--

Message: 9
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 14:32:37 -0600
To: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx
From: "Rodolfo J. Paiz" <rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: SV: Complaint about change in spam controls of mailing
  lists @ Red Hat
Reply-To: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx

At 09:33 PM 4/23/2003 +1000, you wrote:
>   not to be overly anal  but 209 210 and 211 are not class A  but
class C

Classes don't really exist any more on modern networks, just some old
farts 
refer to them sometimes for convenience. We all meant the 209.0.0.0/8, 
210.0.0.0/8, and 211.0.0.0/8 CIDR netblocks. Better that way?


-- 
Rodolfo J. Paiz
rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx




--__--__--

Message: 10
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 17:33:01 +0200
From: Michael Schwendt <ms0301rh@xxxxxxxx>
To: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: how to find system serial number
Reply-To: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 23 Apr 2003 05:35:23 -0700 (PDT), from sinha wrote:

> I couldn't find the command "dmidecode" ..it says
> "command not found"

Then install the "kernel-utils" package and make sure the program
is in your $PATH. And *please*, don't reply at the top of mails.

- -- 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+prIt0iMVcrivHFQRAsWkAJ9MBfi1o7DPpsIvU5E1mLlYSelb2wCffzfO
JpPGq2tJ+NXhJJANaUYh1M0=
=7pPs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




--__--__--

Message: 11
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 15:44:45 -0600
To: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx
From: "Rodolfo J. Paiz" <rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ipchains and masquerading help
Reply-To: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx

At 09:00 PM 4/23/2003 +1000, you wrote:
>nic one -> static IP address, routed through adsl modem.
(210.8.131.XXX)
>(ETH0)
>nic two -> dhc
p'ing 192.168 address --> net interface 192.168.0.1
(ETH1)
>
>I can reach the internet from nic one without a problem, but trying to
get
>out
>from nic two, does not work, I believe it's a problem with it not
>masquerading
>correctly... or at all..

I don't see a MASQ command anywhere in your iptables, but then again was

only able to take a very quick peek. May I suggest that you download and

run Shorewall (www.shorewall.net) instead of using lokkit? I have found
it 
extremely easy, intuitive, and powerful, and I'd bet you have your 
configuration properly set up and working in about 30 minutes with it.


-- 
Rodolfo J. Paiz
rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx





--__--__--

-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
Psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list


End of Psyche-list Digest



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
Psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Red Hat General Discussion]     [Centos]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux