On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 04:13:51PM -0500, Brent Fox wrote: > On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 13:58, Marek wrote: > > My point is that this 6 month cycle generally sucks. Can't we get a new > > version once a year that is near perfect instead of pushing out 2 > > versions a year that are never bulletproof ? > > No. Look at the rate of improvement that the 6 month cycle has > maintained over the years. It does not "generally suck." > > Feel free to upgrade every other release if you want a 12 month release > cycle. Or purchase Red Hat Enterprise Linux and you'll get a 12-18 month release cycle that's specifically targetted towards stable (i.e. non-bleeding edge) environments. You can have stable or you can have bleeding-edge. You can't have both. -- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:ewilts@xxxxxxxxxx Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program -- Psyche-list mailing list Psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
