Not using g++ driver-- just gcc. I guess you're saying its not a bug, its a feature. At 02:16 PM 3/28/2003 -0500, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 02:08:39PM -0500, John Ketchum wrote:
> On further investigation, it turns out that this problem is specific to C++
> programs. When compiling with gcc 3.2, the linker can't find libstdc++,
> or has unresolved symbols for some other reason, without explicitly
> referring to -lstdc++ in the link step. When using gcc 2.95.3, the
> explicit reference to -lstdc++ isn't necessary. I will enter this in
> Bugzilla.
Are you linking using g++ driver (and not using gcc, or even worse ld alone)? (only g++ adds -lstdc++ automatically).
Jakub
-- Psyche-list mailing list Psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
John Ketchum Qualcomm Inc. 9 Damonmill Square Suite 2A Concord, MA 01742
-- Psyche-list mailing list Psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
