On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Kevin Waterson wrote: > This one time, at band camp, > Brent Fox <bfox@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > We won't release errata or updates for 7.3 after the End Of Life period > > arrives. With the RHL line, there's no distinction between paying > > customers and unpaid customers once the product goes EOL. > > Ok, so if 9.0 goes EOL, I cannot get updates unless I use the > Enterprise line > > > > If you really need a version that you can run for 5 years, then > > buy the Enterprise line and pay us for that level of service. > > Across our network this could be quite expensive, with approx 600 > installations, more on that later. What I cannot see, is how you > can be offering updates to the Enterprise line, without making > the source available. Perhaps I am missing something bleeding > obvious here. What is this?? ftp://carroll.cac.psu.edu/pub/linux/distributions/redhat/redhat/linux/enterprise/2.1AS/en/os/i386/SRPMS/ -- .............Tom "Nothing would please me more than being able to tdiehl@xxxxxxxxxxxx hire ten programmers and deluge the hobby market with good software." -- Bill Gates 1976 We are still waiting .... -- Psyche-list mailing list Psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
