Re: Filesystems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 17:50 18 Feb 2003, Pavel Rozenboim <pavelr@coresma.com> wrote:
| From: David.Grudek@anixter.com [mailto:David.Grudek@anixter.com]
| > Does anyone know why different filesystems are available on so many of the
| > other distro's but Red Hat does not support them.  Mandrake, Suse, Debian,
| > Slackware, and others do support xfs.  It handles acl's natively and Red Hat
| > took out acl support in there new kernel yet they won't support filesystems
| > that do support ACL's. [...]
|
| Probably because it is much harder to support all these filesystems. The
| fact that RedHat doesn't just throw in every piece of software it can grab
| allows them to create very stable and supportable distro.

Further, nothing prevents you building a new kernel with the support
you want.

ACLs are generally overrated anyway. Very rarely do I want one.
-- 
Cameron Simpson, DoD#743        cs@zip.com.au    http://www.zip.com.au/~cs/

Those who live by the sword KILL those who don't.



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
Psyche-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Red Hat General Discussion]     [Centos]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux