Re: Much Slower than 7.2?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Monday, December 23, 2002, 12:11:10 PM, Samuel wrote:
> On the x86 arch you can't have a swap device more than 2G.  You can
> have a goodly number of swap devices. (The max is defined in the kernel 
> source.)

That's a pretty big area to search. I've poked around in what I
thought were some likely spots and didn't find it. I did find
something that claims that the number of swap files is 32 (rather than
the 8 documented in mkswap(8)).

> Are you certain the issue is memory related?

No. That was a guess. I've read that the VM system has been in a state
of flux for some time. Of course, there's a new gcc in RH 8.0 that
could be having an impact, too. I suppose grabbing an old executable
off a backup would allow me to eliminate that from consideration.
Seems hard to believe that the current gcc would be generating code 8
times slower than it was a couple releases back.

> Have you tested things to see if your disk io is as fast as it use
> to be?  ` hdparm -t /dev/$drive`

Well, I don't really know how fast it used to be. However, it is the
same hardware and filesystem that it was before. The data going into
my compilation process has not changed at all since June, when I did
the 6:50 run. The hdparm test shows a read speed of 34.90 MB/sec.

Ron.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.8
Comment: Until recently, the last PGP with full source disclosure.

iQA/AwUBPgdZ/m8pw+2/9pUJEQIoxACfVgm2wLtmpX95MFY7wkrEWRklR1sAoJWq
QYjd2jzDjJ3DMzHxuyrPWk6j
=iOpC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
Psyche-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Red Hat General Discussion]     [Centos]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux