Michael is the issue of my font really big enough to reply to without addressing my actual problem? On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 18:49, Michael Kuss wrote: > On 17 Dec 2002, Scott Taylor wrote: > > > > > > Scott > > > > would it be possible not to include more or less stupid sigs, moreover if > they contain a a non-ascii character set which replaces my font when > replying? > > Thanks, > > Michael > > > > -- > Psyche-list mailing list > Psyche-list@redhat.com > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list -- Scott Taylor Managing Director 4i dotCom Phone: +44 7767 257 371 Email: scott.taylor@4i-dotcom.com Web: http://www.4i-dotcom.com This transmission is confidential and intended for the named recipient only. Should you not be the person or entity named, please be advised that you have received this in error, and that you should delete this immediately. "µú¡ ÛûÚV´}_aGG)O¤ÇÞäïeØW `îÀOÃüÀJèeBò ˵ýõ[\%ð;.Aó¶ ¡UGÒ~å?~¹PÉFÃL¬7¾tI -- Psyche-list mailing list Psyche-list@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
