Hey, remember that Trmac was right and I was wrong. They can be replaced with one command: (make sure you remove the glibc-debug* packages first) # rpm -Uvh glibc-2.2.93-5.i386.rpm openssl-0.9.6b-29.i386.rpm \ --oldpackage That wrapped of course, so remember it's one line. On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 15:10, Cowles, Steve wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chris Kloiber > > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:38 PM > > Subject: Re: Moving RH-8.0 to another architecture (586/686) > > > > > > On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 14:06, Cowles, Steve wrote: > > > I have looked at (printed) all the rpm's architectures and > > > only see that the kernel is compiled for a particular > > > architecture. Everything else seems to be i386 based. i.e. > > > rpm -qa. Even glibc. > > > > glibc-common is i386, but glibc itself is i686 if installed > > on an i686. You could try: > > > > # rpm -qa | grep glibc-debug | xargs rpm -e > > (Don't need 'em, and might cause grief in this case.) > > # rpm -e --nodeps --justdb openssl > > (it's also an i686 package) > > # rpm -ivh openssl-0.9.6b-29.i386.rpm > > (install the i386 openssl) > > # rpm -e --nodeps --justdb glibc > > (remove the i686 version, hopefully without crashing) > > # rpm -ivh glibc-2.2.93-5.i386.rpm > > (Install the i386 glibc right on top of the existing files. > > Hopefully > > there won't be conflicts, but I don't know for sure.) > > > > Well crap... I figured as much. That's what I get for trying to minimize my > downtime with my available resources. Plus, my knowledge of the rpm command > is minimal. :-( > > At this point, I have nothing to lose by trying to replace any of the above > RPM's with the 386 architecture. In its current state -- my new harddrive > will not work on the target system. > > Thanks for the reply > Steve Cowles -- Chris Kloiber -- Psyche-list mailing list Psyche-list@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
