Jean Francois Martinez wrote: > I wrote a numerical analysis who was published in february 1999 and Is that available online? > basically you don't gain 5%. It is closer to 1.5% to 2.5% and this > when you are running kernel code (when you are running user mode code > it is unaffected). And since 2002 machines are much bigger than the > 32 meg box I used as an example the memory savings brought by a kernel > compile are still more irrelevant What compiler? gcc-3 is supposed to have better optimization. Perhaps the numbers would be different now? -Thomas -- Psyche-list mailing list Psyche-list@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
