Re: i386 kernel not included?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Michael Schwendt wrote:

>Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 19:30:56 +0200
>From: Michael Schwendt <rh0210ms@arcor.de>
>To: psyche-list@redhat.com
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>List-Id: Discussion of Red Hat Linux 8.0 (Psyche) <psyche-list.redhat.com>
>Subject: Re: i386 kernel not included?
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:51:46 -0500, Thomas Dodd wrote:
>
>> example
>> i686                      athlon
>> movl -24(%edp), %edx      andl -24(%edp), %eax
>> andl %edx, %eax
>> 
>> 
>> movl %eax, %edx           imull $100, %eax, %edx
>> movl %edx, %eax
>
>Eh? First EDX=EAX, then EAX=EDX? =:-}

My guess is it is simply another way of doing a NOP, possibly 
better than an actual NOP for scheduling on the i686.


-- 
Mike A. Harris		ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris
OS Systems Engineer
XFree86 maintainer
Red Hat Inc.



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
Psyche-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Red Hat General Discussion]     [Centos]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux