Re: i386 kernel not included?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Petr Soucek wrote:

>Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 17:32:18 +0200
>From: Petr Soucek <petr@ryston.cz>
>To: psyche-list@redhat.com
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>List-Id: Discussion of Red Hat Linux 8.0 (Psyche) <psyche-list.redhat.com>
>Subject: Re: i386 kernel not included?
>
>On 20 Oct 2002, at 11:07, Mike A. Harris wrote:
>
>> Where did you find this policy?  I'd be interested in having a
>> look at our publically posted policy if we've got one posted
>> somewhere.  Do you have a URL handy?
>
>here it is:
>
>http://www.redhat.com/apps/support/errata/
>
>states that:
>
>> Important: Red Hat's errata release policy supports the two most
>> recent major product releases. All minor releases in the current
>> product release cycle are supported as is the final release of the
>> prior product release cycle.

Wow.  That is a notoriously ambiguous and confusing statement to
me, and I work here!  ;o)

I'm forwarding the above statement internally to try and have the 
notice expanded to something more concrete and less confusing.

Thanks for pointing this out to me.

Take care,
TTYL

-- 
Mike A. Harris		ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris
OS Systems Engineer
XFree86 maintainer
Red Hat Inc.



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
Psyche-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Red Hat General Discussion]     [Centos]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux