Re: Is Redhat's postman asleep?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:35:16 +0100 (BST)
M A Young <m.a.young@durham.ac.uk> wrote:

#  What is being discussed here is whether there has to be an A record
#  if
# there is an MX record with the same name, and I don't believe there
# is anything in the RFCs that requires that.
# 
#  The reason why many mail domains (eg. redhat.com) happen to have an
#  A
# record of the same name is to do with lazy web address typing -
# redhat.com is a CNAME for www.redhat.com, not mx1.redhat.com - but
# this is a relatively recent phenomenon in internet history.

Correct. the A record does not have to be the same name as the domain.
 You can have an MX record for domainbar.com, that points to
"mx2.domainfoo.com".  They aren't even the same domains, but as long
as the MX record points to a valid A record, things should be happy.

-- 
Jesse Keating
j2Solutions.net
Mondo DevTeam (www.mondorescue.org)

Was I helpful?  Let others know:
 http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
Psyche-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Red Hat General Discussion]     [Centos]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux