Re: SMP Kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SMP Kernel
From: Miloslav Trmac <mitr@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 21:41:26 +0200
Delivered-to: psyche-list@listman.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <20021010160418.GA5426@redhat.com>
References: <1034259114.1011.205.camel@zeus.ac-services.ca> <20021010160418.GA5426@redhat.com>
Reply-to: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: psyche-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 12:04:18PM -0400, Jay Turner wrote:
> kernel-smp-2.4.18-14.athlon.rpm
> kernel-smp-2.4.18-14.i686.rpm
> 
> Those look like SMP kernels to me, so I would be very interested in hearing
> why he thinks we don't.
Because he needs i586.rpm ?
	Mirek

References:
- SMP Kernel
  - From: Thom Paine
- Re: SMP Kernel
  - From: Jay Turner

Prev by Date: Re: metacity window resize
Next by Date: Re: metacity window resize
Previous by thread: Re: SMP Kernel
Next by thread: Re: SMP Kernel
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora General Discussion] [Red Hat General Discussion] [Centos] [Kernel] [Red Hat Install] [Red Hat Watch] [Red Hat Development] [Red Hat 9] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux