Rationale behind UTF-8?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Rationale behind UTF-8?
From: Robert Claeson <r.claeson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 10 Oct 2002 12:03:01 +0200
Delivered-to: psyche-list@listman.redhat.com
Reply-to: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: psyche-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx

I noticed that Unicode UTF-8 is now the default encoding when most
Western Europeans locales are selected. Since some ISO 8859 character
set is usually the norm for those locales, I would be interested in the
rationale behind Psyche using UTF-8 rather than ISO 8859.

/Robert

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rationale behind UTF-8?
  - From: Havoc Pennington

Prev by Date: Re: Cisco VPN and GCC 3.2
Next by Date: Install problems
Previous by thread: CPU L2 Cache 32kb should be 512kb!!
Next by thread: Re: Rationale behind UTF-8?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora General Discussion] [Red Hat General Discussion] [Centos] [Kernel] [Red Hat Install] [Red Hat Watch] [Red Hat Development] [Red Hat 9] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux