Re: OT: xfs vs. freetype

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thks, Mike, I really appreciated your answers/advices.

Best,

Andre

On Sat, 3 May 2003 13:15:25 -0400 (EDT)
"Mike A. Harris" <mharris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Upgrading random core operating system libraries like freetype 
> generally will get you in trouble.  There is no really good 
> reason to upgrade it.  Also, upgrading freetype would mean that 
> your entire OS is now unsupported.  Any font related problems you 
> might encounter, you would have to resolve on your own.
[...]
> Our freetype is patched with a few things that are expected to be
> there by other parts of the OS.  If you replace freetype, then
> you'll have problems unless you also re-engineer our patches into
> it.  You may also possibly have to rebuild parts of the OS that
> use freetype.
> 
> Although I haven't personally tried it, stock freetype will most
> likely result in all Xft using apps misbehaving.  At a minimum 
> though, you will lose some functionality.

-- 
Andre Oliveira da Costa



_______________________________________________
xfree86-list mailing list
xfree86-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/xfree86-list
IRC: #xfree86 on irc.redhat.com

[Red Hat General]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Kernel Development]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux