Re: ttmkfdir

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 07 November 2002 17:17, Thomas Dodd wrote:
> >2.  When you use ttmkfdir -m 100 you get a lot more fonts since some some
> > of the strange fonts do not have a full character set.  Is this a good
> > idea? When mkfontscale is "ready" to replace ttmkfdir, what will be done
> > about this capability or will all be listed even those that are a bit
> > sparse? 
>
>  From the mkfontscale man page:
>
> -f <fuzz>  Set the fraction of characters that may be missing in large
> encodings to <fuzz> percent. Defaults to 2%.
>
> Looks like the -a option from ttmkfdir, which also defaults to 2%.

Mmmm ... I read the man page also:

      −f encoding
              add encoding to the list of forced encodings.

Where is the "fuzz"?

-- 
--
Gene



_______________________________________________
xfree86-list mailing list
xfree86-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/xfree86-list
IRC: #xfree86 on irc.redhat.com

[Red Hat General]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Kernel Development]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux