Re: Postgresql in RH 8 and up.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 09:05:29PM +0100, Trond Eivind Glomsr?d wrote:
> l??r, 2002-12-28 kl. 23:36 skrev John:
> > On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Rodger Donaldson wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > Starting with 8, and apprently to continue with 8.1, postgresql
> > > appears to be lacking large chunks of hitherto present functionality,
> > > such as the pgaccess client.  Are there any plans to restore this, or
> > > are we supposed to rush off and buy the RedHat Database Server?
> > 
> > File it as a bug report. It's in the source, just looks forgotten.
> 
> It wasn't shipped as minimal exposure to tk was desired (if memory
> serves, it was even removed from one of the betas), it wasn't i18ned
> (tcl + i18n... ouch),it wasn't really supportable and and a better
> DB-independent replacement, tora, was added.

That would be fine if tora had been built with pg support.  And a
tk-less distro would be a pain...

-- 
Rodger Donaldson		rodgerd@diaspora.gen.nz
FOOD. IS BAD.  
NOT BACKED UP.



_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
Redhat-devel-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Red Hat General]     [Fedora]     [Red Hat Install]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux