On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Carlos wrote: > Em Seg 02 Dez 2002 21:57, Peter Bowen escreveu: > > On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 17:02, Carlos wrote: > > > Why did you use dietlibc? Why did you not use glibc ? > > > > dietlibc, as the name suggests, is a lightweight libc. It generates > > noticibly smaller static executables that those linked against glibc. > > This is important for anaconda as space is at a premium on the boot > > floppies. > > > > Thanks. > > Peter > > May I compile the sources using normal glibc instead of dietlibc ? If you remove all the dietlibc-stuff from the build process it *should* build and run ok as such (not that I've tested) but it will NOT fit on the boot floppies! -- - Panu - _______________________________________________ Redhat-devel-list mailing list Redhat-devel-list@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
