Re: GCC Differences

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14 Jun 2002, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:

> Chris Rode <electro@tux.bursar.arizona.edu> writes:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > float toot(int x, float y) {
> >    if (y == 20) {
> >       return y;
> >    } else {
> >       toot(x, x*y);              (**)
> >    }
> > }
> > 
> > 
> > Compiled with Red Hat's gcc 2.96, I get "nan" (however, If I take out 
> > the recursive call, and just return x*y, I get 20.000000).
> > 
> > Compiled with Debian's 2.95.4, I get 20.000000.
> 
> If you compiled with "-Wall" you'd have seen that the line I
> marked with a (**) misses a "return"; currently, the function
> "toot" returns an "unspecified" value when y != 20, thus
> different versions of gcc may effectively produce different
> values.
> 
> Conclusion, always compile with -Wall :-).

Oh, DUH.  Now that you point it out, it's blindingly obvious.  Thanks for 
the help. :)

--Chris.




_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
Redhat-devel-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Red Hat General]     [Fedora]     [Red Hat Install]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux