Re: What about breaking rc.sysint up into an rc.sysinit.d

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 07:19, Robin Holt wrote:
> 
> 1) rc.sysinit.d would be created.
> 2) rc.sysinit script would be broken into many small scripts, each with 
> a definite purpose.
>     ie: the launching setting of networking options would end up being a 
> script named rc.sysinit.d/10network.
> 3) rc.sysinit would then simply source each of those scripts in 
> numerical order.
> What this would allow is when a third party is building an rpm for 
> RedHat, they would not need to have a %pre and %post which patches 
> rc.sysinit.

I definitely agree. rc.sysinit is the last BSD-style remnant in a SysV
structure.
The idea behind SysV is to modularize, so that there's no need to edit
critical files, but just create symlinks as needed. Breaking rc.sysinit
into a directory is the logical next step towards a fully modularised
startup mechanism.

-- 
Florin Andrei

"You can get excited about just any subject if you study it enough.
It's the deep knowledge that makes a topic interesting." - Larry McVoy



_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
Redhat-devel-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Red Hat General]     [Fedora]     [Red Hat Install]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux