Re: What about breaking rc.sysint up into an rc.sysinit.d

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>The one I am coming across right now is lkcd (Linux Kernel Crash Dump) 
>>which needs the crash dump command run before the swapon occurs.  This 
>>happens in rc.sysinit.  Any other suggestions are welcome, but I think 
>>this would make the addition of new early init pieces more modular.
>>
>>
> In that case then you need to be able to add code that will run before 
> rc.sysinit and after (not yours, but the feature would need to be complete
> in that way...james  
> 


LKCD needs to occur after /sbin/devfsd is started (another piece that
is no longer in rc.sysint).  If you look at the devfsd spec file, it
accomplishes this by modifying rc.sysint.  Looking at these pieces made
me question breaking rc.sysinit up.  To me, it seems like a natural
progression of the init process which would make rc.sysinit work in
a method similar to rc[0-6].d.

Is there any compelling reason to _NOT_ break this up?  Am I missing

a big picture item?

Thanks,
Robin Holt




_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
Redhat-devel-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Red Hat General]     [Fedora]     [Red Hat Install]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux