Hello Mirsad!
On Wed 10-07-24 20:09:27, Mirsad Todorovac wrote:
> On the linux-next vanilla next-20240709 tree, I have attempted the seed KCONFIG_SEED=0xEE7AB52F
> which was known from before to trigger various errors in compile and build process.
>
> Though this might seem as contributing to channel noise, Linux refuses to build this config,
> treating warnings as errors, using this build line:
>
> $ time nice make W=1 -k -j 36 |& tee ../err-next-20230709-01a.log; date
>
> As I know that the Chief Penguin doesn't like warnings, but I am also aware that there are plenty
> left, there seems to be more tedious work ahead to make the compilers happy.
>
> The compiler output is:
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> fs/reiserfs/do_balan.c: In function ‘balance_leaf_new_nodes_paste_whole’:
> fs/reiserfs/do_balan.c:1147:13: error: variable ‘leaf_mi’ set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
> 1147 | int leaf_mi;
> | ^~~~~~~
Frankly, I wouldn't bother with reiserfs. The warning is there for ages,
the code is going to get removed in two releases, so I guess we can live
with these warnings for a few more months...
Honza
> CC fs/reiserfs/lbalance.o
> fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c: In function ‘dc_check_balance_leaf’:
> fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c:1938:13: error: variable ‘maxsize’ set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
> 1938 | int maxsize, ret;
> | ^~~~~~~
> fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c:1935:13: error: variable ‘levbytes’ set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
> 1935 | int levbytes;
> | ^~~~~~~~
> fs/reiserfs/prints.c: In function ‘prepare_error_buf’:
> fs/reiserfs/prints.c:221:17: error: function ‘prepare_error_buf’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Werror=suggest-attribute=format]
> 221 | p += vscnprintf(p, end - p, fmt1, args);
> | ^
> fs/reiserfs/prints.c:260:9: error: function ‘prepare_error_buf’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Werror=suggest-attribute=format]
> 260 | p += vscnprintf(p, end - p, fmt1, args);
> | ^
> make[4]: Target 'arch/x86/kernel/' not remade because of errors.
> make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:485: arch/x86/kernel] Error 2
> make[3]: Target 'arch/x86/' not remade because of errors.
> make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:485: arch/x86] Error 2
> fs/reiserfs/lbalance.c: In function ‘leaf_copy_items’:
> fs/reiserfs/lbalance.c:524:29: error: variable ‘dest’ set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
> 524 | struct buffer_head *dest;
> | ^~~~
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:244: fs/reiserfs/do_balan.o] Error 1
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:244: fs/reiserfs/prints.o] Error 1
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:244: fs/reiserfs/fix_node.o] Error 1
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> In fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c:1938:13, fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c:1935:13, and fs/reiserfs/lbalance.c:524:29,
> the problem seem to lie within the construct RFALSE(), like
>
> 521 static int leaf_copy_items(struct buffer_info *dest_bi, struct buffer_head *src,
> 522 int last_first, int cpy_num, int cpy_bytes)
> 523 {
> 524 struct buffer_head *dest;
> 525 int pos, i, src_nr_item, bytes;
> 526
> 527 dest = dest_bi->bi_bh;
> 528 RFALSE(!dest || !src, "vs-10210: !dest || !src");
> 529 RFALSE(last_first != FIRST_TO_LAST && last_first != LAST_TO_FIRST,
> 530 "vs-10220:last_first != FIRST_TO_LAST && last_first != LAST_TO_FIRST");
> 531 RFALSE(B_NR_ITEMS(src) < cpy_num,
> 532 "vs-10230: No enough items: %d, req. %d", B_NR_ITEMS(src),
> 533 cpy_num);
> 534 RFALSE(cpy_num < 0, "vs-10240: cpy_num < 0 (%d)", cpy_num);
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Best regards,
> Mirsad Todorovac
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
