Re: [syzbot] [reiserfs?] possible deadlock in super_lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



syzbot suspects this issue was fixed by commit:

commit fd1464105cb37a3b50a72c1d2902e97a71950af8
Author: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Date:   Wed Oct 18 15:29:24 2023 +0000

    fs: Avoid grabbing sb->s_umount under bdev->bd_holder_lock

bisection log:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=14639595e80000
start commit:   2cf0f7156238 Merge tag 'nfs-for-6.6-2' of git://git.linux-..
git tree:       upstream
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=710dc49bece494df
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=062317ea1d0a6d5e29e7
syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=107e9518680000

If the result looks correct, please mark the issue as fixed by replying with:

#syz fix: fs: Avoid grabbing sb->s_umount under bdev->bd_holder_lock

For information about bisection process see: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bisection




[Index of Archives]     [Linux File System Development]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Ext4 Filesystem]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux