On Thu, 2023-01-12 at 12:15 -0500, Paul Moore wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 5:42 AM Roberto Sassu > <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > One of the major goals of LSM stacking is to run multiple LSMs side by side > > without interfering with each other. The ultimate decision will depend on > > individual LSM decision. > > > > Several changes need to be made to the LSM infrastructure to be able to > > support that. This patch set tackles one of them: gives to each LSM the > > ability to specify one or multiple xattrs to be set at inode creation > > time and, at the same time, gives to EVM the ability to access all those > > xattrs and calculate the HMAC on them. > > ... > > > The patch set has been tested with both the SElinux and Smack test suites. > > Below, there is the summary of the test results: > > > > SELinux Test Suite result (without patches): > > Files=73, Tests=1346, 225 wallclock secs ( 0.43 usr 0.23 sys + 6.11 cusr 58.70 csys = 65.47 CPU) > > Result: FAIL > > Failed 4/73 test programs. 13/1346 subtests failed. > > > > SELinux Test Suite result (with patches): > > Files=73, Tests=1346, 225 wallclock secs ( 0.44 usr 0.22 sys + 6.15 cusr 59.94 csys = 66.75 CPU) > > Result: FAIL > > Failed 4/73 test programs. 13/1346 subtests failed. > > Can you provide some more information on which of the > selinux-testsuite tests failed? That shouldn't be happening and I'm a > little concerned that these test failures, even if unrelated to your > work here, could be masking failures which are related. Uhm, my virtual machine has been used for many tests and was not clean. This time, I installed a fresh Fedora 37 and compiled the kernel with the same configuration as the shipped kernel. Everything works now: All tests successful. Files=74, Tests=1363, 210 wallclock secs ( 0.42 usr 0.11 sys + 6.66 cusr 22.33 csys = 29.52 CPU) Result: PASS Roberto
