Hello, syzbot found the following issue on: HEAD commit: c194837ebb57 Merge branch 'for-next/core', remote-tracking.. git tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-kernelci console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1593ce6c880000 kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=15a770deac0c935a dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=5e385bfa7d505b075d9f compiler: Debian clang version 13.0.1-++20220126092033+75e33f71c2da-1~exp1~20220126212112.63, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2 userspace arch: arm64 syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=122b7298880000 C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=10565740880000 Downloadable assets: disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/8d8ae425e7fa/disk-c194837e.raw.xz vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/c540d501ebe7/vmlinux-c194837e.xz IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit: Reported-by: syzbot+5e385bfa7d505b075d9f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx REISERFS warning (device loop0): jdm-20006 create_privroot: xattrs/ACLs enabled and couldn't find/create .reiserfs_priv. Failing mount. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.0.0-rc6-syzkaller-17742-gc194837ebb57 #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor305/3030 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8000126e50f0 (&journal->j_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe fs/reiserfs/reiserfs.h:814 [inline] ffff8000126e50f0 (&journal->j_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_journal fs/reiserfs/journal.c:534 [inline] ffff8000126e50f0 (&journal->j_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: do_journal_begin_r+0x148/0x598 fs/reiserfs/journal.c:3046 but task is already holding lock: ffff0000cb639460 (sb_writers#8){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x28/0xd8 fs/namespace.c:437 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (sb_writers#8){.+.+}-{0:0}: percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline] __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1826 [inline] sb_start_write+0x78/0x1e4 include/linux/fs.h:1901 mnt_want_write_file+0x28/0xd8 fs/namespace.c:437 reiserfs_ioctl+0x118/0x2a0 fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c:103 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xd0/0x140 fs/ioctl.c:856 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline] invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline] el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142 do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206 el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:636 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:654 el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 -> #1 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common+0xd4/0xca8 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x44 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799 reiserfs_write_lock_nested+0x44/0x68 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:78 reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe fs/reiserfs/reiserfs.h:815 [inline] lock_journal fs/reiserfs/journal.c:534 [inline] do_journal_begin_r+0x154/0x598 fs/reiserfs/journal.c:3046 journal_begin+0x90/0x190 fs/reiserfs/journal.c:3254 reiserfs_remount+0x5e4/0x788 fs/reiserfs/super.c:1559 legacy_reconfigure+0x68/0x7c fs/fs_context.c:633 reconfigure_super+0x1b0/0x33c fs/super.c:934 do_remount fs/namespace.c:2702 [inline] path_mount+0x7e4/0x914 fs/namespace.c:3362 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3383 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3591 [inline] __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3568 [inline] __arm64_sys_mount+0x2c4/0x3c4 fs/namespace.c:3568 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline] invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline] el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142 do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206 el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:636 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:654 el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 -> #0 (&journal->j_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3095 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3214 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3829 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x1530/0x30a4 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5053 lock_acquire+0x100/0x1f8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5666 __mutex_lock_common+0xd4/0xca8 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x44 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799 reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe fs/reiserfs/reiserfs.h:814 [inline] lock_journal fs/reiserfs/journal.c:534 [inline] do_journal_begin_r+0x148/0x598 fs/reiserfs/journal.c:3046 journal_begin+0x90/0x190 fs/reiserfs/journal.c:3254 reiserfs_dirty_inode+0x6c/0x108 fs/reiserfs/super.c:710 __mark_inode_dirty+0x74/0x348 fs/fs-writeback.c:2381 mark_inode_dirty include/linux/fs.h:2462 [inline] reiserfs_ioctl+0x270/0x2a0 fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c:111 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xd0/0x140 fs/ioctl.c:856 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline] invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline] el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142 do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206 el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:636 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:654 el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &journal->j_mutex --> &sbi->lock --> sb_writers#8 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(sb_writers#8); lock(&sbi->lock); lock(sb_writers#8); lock(&journal->j_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by syz-executor305/3030: #0: ffff0000cb639460 (sb_writers#8){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x28/0xd8 fs/namespace.c:437 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 3030 Comm: syz-executor305 Not tainted 6.0.0-rc6-syzkaller-17742-gc194837ebb57 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/26/2022 Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x1c4/0x1f0 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:156 show_stack+0x2c/0x54 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:163 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x104/0x16c lib/dump_stack.c:106 dump_stack+0x1c/0x58 lib/dump_stack.c:113 print_circular_bug+0x2c4/0x2c8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2053 check_noncircular+0x14c/0x154 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2175 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3095 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3214 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3829 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x1530/0x30a4 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5053 lock_acquire+0x100/0x1f8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5666 __mutex_lock_common+0xd4/0xca8 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x44 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799 reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe fs/reiserfs/reiserfs.h:814 [inline] lock_journal fs/reiserfs/journal.c:534 [inline] do_journal_begin_r+0x148/0x598 fs/reiserfs/journal.c:3046 journal_begin+0x90/0x190 fs/reiserfs/journal.c:3254 reiserfs_dirty_inode+0x6c/0x108 fs/reiserfs/super.c:710 __mark_inode_dirty+0x74/0x348 fs/fs-writeback.c:2381 mark_inode_dirty include/linux/fs.h:2462 [inline] reiserfs_ioctl+0x270/0x2a0 fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c:111 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xd0/0x140 fs/ioctl.c:856 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline] invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline] el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142 do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206 el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:636 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:654 el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 --- This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors. See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot. syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. syzbot will keep track of this issue. See: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot. syzbot can test patches for this issue, for details see: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#testing-patches
