On 7/14/20 6:10 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 06:05:09AM -0700, trix@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> From: Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> clang static analysis flags this error
>>
>> inode.c:1083:5: warning: Argument to kfree() is the address of the
>> local variable 'unf_single', which is not memory allocated by
>> malloc() [unix.Malloc]
>> kfree(un);
>> ^~~~~~~~~
>> Assignment of 'un'
>>
>> /*
>> * We use this in case we need to allocate
>> * only one block which is a fastpath
>> */
>> unp_t unf_single = 0;
>>
>> ...
>>
>> if (blocks_needed == 1) {
>> un = &unf_single;
>> } else {
>> un = kcalloc(min(blocks_needed, max_to_insert),
>> UNFM_P_SIZE, GFP_NOFS);
>> if (!un) {
>> un = &unf_single;
>> blocks_needed = 1;
>> max_to_insert = 0;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> The logic to free 'un'
>>
>> if (blocks_needed != 1)
>> kfree(un);
>>
>> Because the kcalloc failure falls back to using unf_single,
>> the if-check for the free is wrong.
> I think you mean "Because clang's static analysis is limited, it
> warns incorrectly about this". There's no path to get to the
> kfree with blocks_needed != 1 and un being equal to &unf_single.
Ok.
>> So improve the check.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> fs/reiserfs/inode.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/inode.c b/fs/reiserfs/inode.c
>> index 1509775da040..4d62148e43e6 100644
>> --- a/fs/reiserfs/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/reiserfs/inode.c
>> @@ -1079,7 +1079,7 @@ int reiserfs_get_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t block,
>> UNFM_P_SIZE *
>> blocks_needed);
>>
>> - if (blocks_needed != 1)
>> + if (un != &unf_single)
>> kfree(un);
> I don't actually object to this patch, but your analysis of clang's
> analysis is wrong.
>
