Ref.: https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-f2fs-devel%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg02745.html Signed-off-by: Ivan Shapovalov <intelfx100@xxxxxxxxx> --- Lustre seemed to encounter the same oops and fixed it in a different way, removing set_page_writeback() altogether: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/30/806 We cannot just remove the call to set_page_writeback() at least because later we wait on PG_Writeback flag of that page (in jwait_io())... What is meant by "synchronous write" in that Lustre patch? Is our write "synchronous" in the same sense? I don't know VFS well. Cc'ing Oleg. fs/reiser4/wander.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/reiser4/wander.c b/fs/reiser4/wander.c index ce20d50..0e2c105 100644 --- a/fs/reiser4/wander.c +++ b/fs/reiser4/wander.c @@ -782,7 +782,9 @@ static int write_jnodes_to_disk_extent( node_plugin_by_node(JZNODE(cur))->csum(JZNODE(cur), 0); zrelse(JZNODE(cur)); } + ClearPageError(pg); + set_page_dirty_notag(pg); set_page_writeback(pg); if (get_current_context()->entd) { -- 2.6.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
