On 2015-02-27 at 12:57 +0100, Edward Shishkin wrote: > On 02/27/2015 12:21 AM, Ivan Shapovalov wrote: > > For now, only support the basic case of flags == 0. > > Also support the case of flags == RENAME_NOREPLACE, because it is a no-op for > > local filesystems (destination existence is already checked by VFS). > > Great, > Thanks! > > > Thus no functional changes to the existing code. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ivan Shapovalov <intelfx100@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > Could you please estimate whether it would be hard to also implement the > > RENAME_EXCHANGE flag? > > Why do we need this? For no particular reason. Supporting an interface is better than not supporting it (if it comes at no expense to existing workloads), isn't it? ;) That said, if you have better ideas for junior jobs, then I'm all ears. Thanks, -- Ivan Shapovalov / intelfx /
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
