[PATCH] jbd2: Optimize jbd2_log_do_checkpoint() a bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



When we discover written out buffer in transaction checkpoint list we
don't have to recheck validity of a transaction. Either this is the last
buffer in a transaction - and then we are done - or this isn't and then
we can just take another buffer from the checkpoint list without
dropping j_list_lock.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
---
 fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c | 13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c b/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
index 993a187527f3..3722e2e53638 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
@@ -343,12 +343,15 @@ restart:
 		if (!buffer_dirty(bh)) {
 			if (unlikely(buffer_write_io_error(bh)) && !result)
 				result = -EIO;
-			get_bh(bh);
 			BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "remove from checkpoint");
-			__jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint(jh);
-			spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
-			__brelse(bh);
-			goto retry;
+			if (__jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint(jh)) {
+				/*
+				 * This was the last buffer attached to the
+				 * transaction. We are done.
+				 */
+				goto out;
+			}
+			continue;
 		}
 		/*
 		 * Important: we are about to write the buffer, and
-- 
1.8.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux File System Development]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Ext4 Filesystem]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux