On Sunday 17 August 2014 at 18:37:11, Dušan Čolić wrote: > On Aug 17, 2014 6:18 PM, "Ivan Shapovalov" <intelfx100@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Sunday 17 August 2014 at 18:14:10, Dušan Čolić wrote: > > > [...] > > > > > > > > Points I'm really uncertain of: > > > > - grabbing fixed amount of space (new BA_SOME_SPACE flag, grabs 25% of > > > disk space) > > > > > > Maybe grabbing 25% of remaining empty disk space would be better? > > > > What do you mean by "remaining"? 25% is recalculated on each iteration. > > However, the reserved and allocated disk space is reclaimed at the end > > of each iteration, so the amount really stays the same. > > > I meant not to grab 25% of whole partition size but grab amount of disk > space equal to 25% of empty partition space so if we have only 10% of free > space left we grab only 2.5% of it per iteration so to not get ENOSPACE if > we used 25% of whole disk size and grabbed whole remaining disk space. Ah. I've meant "25% of free disk space at the moment of discarding". It's already done the correct way, I've just misworded it. -- Ivan Shapovalov / intelfx / > > > -- > > Ivan Shapovalov / intelfx / > > > > > > > > > - creation of empty atoms (reiser4_create_atom()) > > > > - handling of empty atoms in commit_current_atom() > > > > > > > [...]
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
