20.07.2014 17:42, dimas пишет: > if you mean backup storage, why do you need such a complicated journaled fs > like ext3 or r4? for mostly static storage, modified once a day or even rarer, > i'd suggest ext2 as a simplest way. > That's the worst possible recommendation: if you don't want to use journal you can just switch it off on ext4. Using outdated ext2 code offers absolutely no advantages. Speaking of reiser4, unfortunately I would not expect it to be recommendable as a viable production-ready upgrade path for 3.6 in the near future. Sadly, there's just not enough resources backing up development at the moment. Feel free to change that though ;-) cheers, Max. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
