On 06/04/2014 12:24 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > For other timekeeping stuff in the kernel, I agree that using some > 64-bit representation (nanoseconds, 32/32 unsigned seconds/nanoseconds, > ...) has advantages, that's exactly the point I was making earlier > against simply extending the internal time_t/timespec to 64-bit > seconds for everything. > How much of a performance issue is it to make time_t 64 bits, and for the bits there are, how hard are they to fix? -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
