On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 09:26:57AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>
>> So I don't think the freeing code could trigger, but a concurrent
>> lookup then trying to look up the new directory (and taking the new
>> directory i_semaphore lock) could happen, afaik.
>
> Umm... The thing is, we'd get WARN_ON() in iput_final() triggering in
> that scenario before lockdep could complain.
Not for the "look up directory in the dcache, and then lock that
inode" case, afaik. You'd get the lock before iput_final(), no?
So then "unlock_new_inode()" would run with the inode mutex held,
which could explain the lockdep warning, no?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
